中文|English

Current issue
2024-5-25
Vol 32, issue 5

ISSUE

2022 年7 期 第30 卷

诊治分析 HTML下载 PDF下载

左束支起搏在心室起搏依赖患者埋藏式心脏复律除颤器植入术中应用的可行性和有效性分析

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Left Bundle-Branch Pacing in Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Implantation inPatients with Ventricular Pacing Dependence

作者:马彦卓,杨茜,陈瑜,齐书英

单位:
050082河北省石家庄市,中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八〇医院心内科 通信作者:齐书英,E-mail:qsy304@126.com
Units:
Department of Cardiology, 980 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics Support Forces, Shijiazhuang 050082, China Corresponding author: QI Shuying, E-mail: qsy304@126.com
关键词:
心律失常,心性; 心动过缓; 心室起搏依赖; 左束支起搏; 埋藏式心脏复律除颤器;
Keywords:
Arrhythmias, cardiac; Bradycardia; Ventricular pacing dependence; Left bundle-branch pacing;Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
CLC:
DOI:
10.12114/j.issn.1008-5971.2022.00.161
Funds:
河北省医学科学研究重点课题(20210200)

摘要:

目的 分析左束支起搏(LBBP)在心室起搏依赖患者埋藏式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入术中应用的可行性和有效性。方法 选取2019年5月至2020年10月由中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九八〇医院心内科医生行ICD植入术的6例心室起搏依赖患者为研究对象。在患者ICD植入术中应用LBBP。收集患者基线资料、手术相关指标和术前、术后QRS波时限(QRSd)、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生情况。结果 6例患者均为男性;年龄40~72岁;心电图表现:室性心动过速(VT)4例,心房颤动(AF)3例,房室传导阻滞(AVB)2例,频发室性期前收缩(VPB)2例,右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)1例,窦房结功能障碍1例,左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)0例;合并症:心源性猝死(SCD)、心肌梗死、高血压、糖尿病各1例;植入ICD类型:单腔ICD 4例,双腔ICD 2例。6例患者术中感知为9.75(8.00,11.75)mV,术中阻抗为(673.3±99.3)Ω,术中阈值为(0.72±0.23)V;无一例患者发生手术相关并发症,手术均成功。患者术前、术后QRSd、LVEDD比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);患者术后LVEF高于术前(P<0.05)。随访期间1例患者因心力衰竭再住院。结论 在心室起搏依赖患者ICD植入术中应用LBBP是安全有效的,这有利于提高患者的心功能,改善其临床预后。

Abstract:

【Abstract】 Objective To analyze the feasibility and effectiveness of left bundle-branch pacing (LBBP) in implantablecardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in patients with ventricular pacing dependence. Methods Six patients withventricular pacing dependence who underwent ICD implantation by the cardiologist of 980 Hospital of PLA Joint Logistics SupportForces from May 2019 to October 2020 were selected as the research objects. LBBP was used in ICD implantation. The baselinedata, operation related indexes, and QRS duration (QRSd) , left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular enddiastolic dimension (LVEDD) before and after surgery, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were collected. ResultsAll 6 patients were male; their ages were 40-72 years old; electrocardiographic manifestations: 4 cases of ventricular tachycardia(VT) , 3 cases of atrial fibrillation (AF) , 2 cases of atrioventricular block (AVB) , 2 cases of frequent premature ventricular beats(VPB) , 1 case of right bundle branch block (RBBB) , 1 case of sinus node dysfunction, and 0 case of left bundle branch block(LBBB) ; comorbidities: sudden cardiac death (SCD) , myocardial infarction, hypertension and diabetes were found in 1 patientrespectively; the type of ICD implanted: 4 cases with single-lumen ICD and 2 cases with double-lumen ICD. The intraoperativeperception of 6 patients was 9.75 (8.00, 11.75) mV, the intraoperative impedance was (673.3±99.3) Ω, and the intraoperativethreshold was (0.72±0.23) V; no patient had surgery-related complications, all patients were successfully operated. There was nosignificant difference in QRSd and LVEDD before and after surgery (P >0.05) ; LVEF after surgery was higher than that beforesurgery (P <0.05) . During the follow-up period, one patient had readmission for heart failure. Conclusion The application ofLBBP in ICD implantation in patients with ventricular pacing dependence is safe and effective, which is beneficial to improve thecardiac function and clinical prognosis of patients.

ReferenceList: